Freedom of Worship?

Liberty Window at Christ Church, PhillidelphiaThe photo above depicts the “Liberty Window” at Christ Church in Philadelphia.  The window is an artist’s rendering of the opening prayer at the First Continental Congress.  I include it here as a reminder of the vibrancy of religious life in the public square here in the United States.

President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have recently been using the phrase, “freedom of worship,” rather than the more robust phrase, “freedom of religion.”   This represents a very narrow view of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

So what’s the big deal?  Isn’t the freedom to worship the same as the freedom of religion?  No.  Religion is more than worship.  The founders of our constitution realized this by considering freedom of religion right up there with freedom to assemble, freedom of the press, and freedom to petition.

What does this have to do with engineering you might ask?  Well, if you are a Christian and an engineer, then your engineering will be motivated by the things you care deeply about, your “issues of the heart.”  That certainly includes your ethics, rooted  in your Christianity, your sense of aesthetics, again rooted in your Christianity, your sense of economics (distribution of wealth) rooted in your Christianity, your sense of care for the environment, rooted in your Christianity, and so forth.  In fact, you find that your faith is the (only) foundation for your engineering.  Likewise, non-christian engineers root their work in their issues of the heart and ultimately in their faith, or lack thereof.  (They must believe something, even if they believe there is no god.)

Now if President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton would like to admit that all of life is worship, then I’m OK with the phrase, “freedom of worship.”  Certainly there are moments when I see intricacies in engineering work that inspire me to worship my Creator.  But I’m sure it’s not so.  Clearly, Obama and Clinton are referring to a very narrow sense of worship as that which is done for about one hour per week in a “house of worship.”  I want a lot more freedom than that in my engineering and in my life.

What President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton are thinking of when they say, “freedom of worship,” is not what we stand for at Dordt College, a Christan college! (Not specifically a house of worship.)

Want to dig deeper?  Here are some more general stories on this topic.

Chuck Colson
George Weigel
Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra

And, interestingly, the “freedom of worship” concept is one of the arguments being used in France to restrict the wearing of a burqa.  Some argue that the burqa is not worship, thus it can be restricted, others disagree.   The burqa, Tariq Ramadan and French Values

Engineers Do It, Scientists Know It

Henry Petroski has a new book out, titled The Essential Engineer: Why Science Alone Will Not Solve Our Global Problems.  One of the themes in the book is that scientists are interested in understanding—that is, knowing things about—nature. In contrast, engineers are interested in creatively doing things in new ways. It is commonly held by many people that engineering is an applied science, but Petroski disagrees. He writes that science does not, “precede engineering in the creative process.” Without doing engineering, scientists would not have the tools and instruments necessary for their work. I fully agree with this perspective. The Essential Engineer

Today I was reviewing some material that I will use in Dordt’s EGR 104 Introduction to Engineering Design class in a few weeks and was again reminded of the central theme of Petroski’s new book.  The material I was reviewing was a clip from the PBS program, “Nova: Science Now” on the topic of fuel-cell powered automobiles.  This clip is really about engineering, but as seems to be the typical stereotype, it is described in the clip as, “science.” Even the title of the program would lead you to believe that this is all about science, when really it is all about engineering. Maybe you say that the science is foundational. After all, without the knowledge of chemistry, where would we be with fuel cell technology? True, engineers need to know science, but false, science is not foundational.  Without engineering—without a desire to creatively reduce pollution with a new fuel—who would think about designing a fuel cell? Science is important, but it does not deserve to be seen as foundational to engineering.

Here is another example.  Many people think of the 1969 lunar landing as a triumph of science.  For example, a web site called interestingly enough, Science Monster, offers a lunar lander game.  I judge that most people would say this game is related to science.  But, planning for a lunar landing, designing the spacecraft, and operating the spacecraft were all activities performed primarily by engineers.  To wit, Neil Armstrong, the first person to walk on the moon, is an engineer.

Consider heart disease research. Is that science? Yes, partly. It is also engineering, maybe mainly engineering. There is even a branch of engineering called biomedical engineering. Is the inventor of the heart pacemaker a scientist? No, Earl Bakken is an engineer.

If you wonder what it is about being an engineer that excites me, it is planning for and doing things that solve technical problems and help people!

ABCD, ABCD, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah

I had an interesting experience today after my “Introduction to Microprocessors and Digital Circuits” class (EGR 204) ended. Professor Ploegstra, who teaches biology in the next hour walked in to prepare the room for his class.  After taking a look at my whiteboard markings he remarked something like, “ABCD, ABCD, blah, blah, blah, bhah.”  I had a whole bunch of Boolean algebra (more than above) on the whiteboard with lots of repetitions of the letters ABCD along with expressions like (A + B + C + D), which is what provoked his remark.  I responded that you can make a lot out of just four letters of the alphabet.  Genetic codes are often given using four letters such as ACGT or ACGU.  We had a good laugh!

Engineering: Because Dreams Need Doing*


Engineering at its core is about creativity and design.  The joy of a completed project is really amazing.  When the electric car project successfully rolled out of the shop on May 6, for the first time fully on electric power, the students on that project started whooping it up, running around, and even jumping for joy.  My students “saw that it was good.”  I wished I had a camera with me to record that exuberant moment but I did not.  Instead, I’ve tried to convey the joy of success at an engineering project via the stock photo above.  (From http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1033778 )

Many times have I talked to someone, usually a parent or teacher, who tells me of a young person who is, “really really good at math and science,” and recommends that this person would make a good engineer. This is a typical stereotype of engineering—that engineering is all about math and science.  Some engineering colleges are even located in the “Math and Applied Science Building” or “Math and Applied Science Division.”  That’s a really superficial view of Engineering.  Talent in math and science helps, but that’s not the whole story.  Sometimes students who have average talents at math and science do really well at engineering because they are creative.

Let me get back to that feeling of joy upon completion of a project. . . (I want to successfully finish another project!)  This joy in creativity is part of our humanity.  We are created in God’s image and God is a creative God.  Our creativity is a reflection of God’s creativity.

But there’s more.  God’s creativity is rooted in His love.  In the Genesis creation story each day ends with, “and God saw that it was good.”  At the end of Genesis 1, “God saw all that He had made, and it was very good.”  That sounds to me like a kind of love for all of creation.  We are part of God’s creation.  When we glorify Him in our lives, God is also joyful.  The origin of true joy is God.  The joy of creatively solving technical problems is what good engineering is really about.

Engineering—it provides a way to do your best dreams.

Postscript:

*The slogan, “Engineering: because dreams need doing,” is proposed by the National Academy of Engineering.  Other proposed slogans are:

“A limitless imagination”

“An enterprising spirit”

“Free to explore”

“Ideas in action”

“Shape the future”

“Life takes engineering”

(Reference: Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, National Academy of Engineering, Changing the Conversation:Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering, Published by the National Academies Press, 2008, available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12187)

Electric Car Project In Video

The Sioux City Journal has now posted a video about the electric car project.

Electric Car Project In The News

The Sioux City Journal covered the electric car project in a front-page story.  The text of the March 7 Journal story can be found here.

Electric Car Is On The Road

I don’t have time to elaborate, but the electric car is on the road. The last connection was made at about 4:30 PM. It was tested on blocks (front wheels off the ground) for a few minutes, and then at 4:45 it went on its first trip on full power. The students drove it around for a few minutes and then I took a turn. There is enough power to peel out. We have more testing to do before we dare try for its top speed. The project will be presented publicly tonight as part of the senior project evening. The presentations start at 7:30 PM, Wednesday, May6, 2009.

EV Project Update

It has been a busy semester.  I’ve not found time to keep my blog up-to-date.  Lots of things have happened with the EV project.  During March a lot of time was spent researching suppliers and ordering parts.  That’s also when spring break happened, so there was a one-week interval when nothing was done on the project.  By the end of March, parts started arriving.  Here are some of the big decisions that were made.

Simulation
The students ran a Matlab simulation of the car to predict the energy needs and choose an appropriate battery pack and motor.  The graph below shows current needed by the motor vs. time.  The vertical axis is current from 0 to 450 A (50 A per tic).  The horizontal axis is time in seconds (0 to 1400 seconds, 200 seconds/tic.)  The simulation is for city driving with lots of starts and stops, a road speed limit of 30 MPH, and a few higher-speed intervals up to 55 MPH. The top speed is near 200 seconds in the simulation where you can see a peak current draw of about 410 A for a second or two.  The average current draw was about 50 A as shown by the horizontal red line. The results below are just a sample of many graphs the the simulation produced.  We expect about 20 to 40 miles of range on a charge depending on how the car is driven.

Current vs. Time

Batteries
Lithium ion batteries would sure be nice, but the price is way too high.  Since this is our first project we decided to go with something known and reliable: lead-acid batteries.  The car will have twelve Trojan J150 batteries.  These are 12 V batteries (6 cells per battery).  Four will go under the front hood in a box mounted over top of the electric motor.  We had to mount the transaxle lower than it originally was.  This lowered the mounting location of the electric motor so that the hood will still close over top of the battery pack that is on top of the motor.  Five more batteries will go under the back seat.  More on that later.  Three will go in the trunk.  This gives a total of 144 V.  The batteries can deliver more than 400 A but we will fuse them at 400 A.  The total electric power available then is 57.6 KW or 77.2 hp.

Efficiency
The total energy stored in a fully charged battery pack will be about 45 MJ (megajoules). For comparison, a gallon of gasoline stores about 132 MJ, so the car will have the energy equivalent of about one-third of a gallon of gasoline in the battery pack when fully charged. Yet we expect at least 20 miles of range and maybe 40 miles. Thus the electric motor is much more efficient than a gasoline engine. We will have the equivalent energy efficiency of at least 60 MPG and up to 120 MPG when measured from battery output to the road. However generating the electricity and charging the car is only about 30% efficient. Overall from fundamental energy source (mine, well-head, hydroelectric dam, windmill, etc.) to the road, electric cars and gasoline cars are not much different.

Electric Motor
We choose an Advanced DC Motors model FB1-4001A which we purchased from Electric Vehicles of America, Inc.  This motor can deliver 30 hp continuously and up to 100 hp for a minute or two without overheating.  The connection we plan to use will limit the peak power to about 77 hp.  The motor is fastened to the existing 5-speed manual transmission by means of an adapter plate we purchased from Canadian Electric Vehicles. Ltd. We mounted the adapter plate to the motor, then put a hub on the motor shaft which allowed us to bolt the flywheel (removed from the gasoline engine) to the hub. Then the clutch module is bolted to the flywheel and the whole assembly is mated up to the transmission, just like a gasoline engine would be.

Electric Motor

Controller
The role of delivering electric power to the electric motor is taken by a package of electronics called a motor controller.  This device replaces the carburetor or throttle-body in a gasoline car. The controller we chose is manufactured by Curtis (model 1231C) and can handle up to 400 A of current.  The accelerator pedal that formerly actuated the throttle plate on the gasoline engine will now be reconnected to a potentiometer mounted in a small metal box.  This is called a “pot box” for short.  The potentiometer is a variable resistance which sends a signal to the controller.

Under normal operation the controller turns the electric motor on and off about 15000 times a second.  As you press harder on the accelerator the resistance of the pot-box element increases and the time during which the motor is on increases.  In other words, if you press the accelerator slightly, for example about one-seventh of the way down, the motor is switched on for maybe 0.00001 seconds and then switched off.  Just 0.000067 seconds later the motor is switched on again for 0.00001 seconds and this cycle repeats until the accelerator pedal is moved.  So the motor is only on about one-seventh of the time. When the motor is off it (and the car) coasts.  Since this is happening so rapidly, there is no pulsation or vibration.  The motor just runs more slowly than if it was on all the time.  As you press the accelerator down further the time on increases from 0.00001 to finally 0.00067 seconds out of each 0.00067 second interval (on all the time) when the pedal is all the way down.  This strategy is more efficient than directly reducing the voltage to the motor (using a variable resistor for example) because the motor is not drawing any power much of the time.

Safety Features
1.)  Inertia Switch
In case of a crash we want the high voltage section to shut down automatically so that the car cannot go out-of-control.  We have an inertia switch for this.  If there is ever a very large jerk or impact to the frame, it will be detected and the main contactor will automatically be de-energized until a button on the inertia switch is pushed.  The inertia switch is not so sensitive as to react to ordinary pot-holes in the road however.  (Most gasoline powered cars also have an inertia switch.  It shuts down the fuel pump if there is a crash.)

2.) Secondary Contactor
The main power to the controller (and hence to the motor) goes through a part called a contactor.  This is like a circuit breaker but it is remotely controlled by a low-voltage (12 V) signal.  That signal comes from the key switch.  When the key is “ON” or in the “RUN” position the main contactor conducts the high-voltage power to to the controller.  When the key is “OFF” or in the “LOCK” position the power to the controller is blocked.  But it is possible for the main contactor to fail in a “welded closed” mode, meaning power will not be shut down when the key is off.  Because of this possibility, we added a secondary contactor.  The secondary contactor is connected to a small switch on the pot-box.  When the accelerator pedal is fully up, the secondary contactor also breaks the high-voltage circuit to the controller.  Thus there are two fully redundant ways to shut the high-voltage power off.  This also offers protection in case the controller fails in a full-power mode.  (This failure would make the controller incorrectly act as if the accelerator pedal was floored.)  The driver would instinctively let the accelerator pedal up and then the secondary contactor will shut the power off.

3.) Charger Interlock
It is possible for the driver to attempt to drive away with the charging power cord still connected.  We added an interlock relay to prevent the secondary contactor from energizing if the car is plugged in for charging.

4.) Starter action
Sometimes people turn the key switch on their car to “ON” or “RUN” just to listen to the radio, but they do not actually start the engine.  When this is done nobody would expect the car to move if the accelerator pedal was depressed since the engine is not running. A bunch of the dashboard warning lights (e.g. “oil pressure”) will be on as well, indicating that the engine is not running.  We wanted to retain this behavior in the conversion.  If you just turn the switch to from “LOCK” or “OFF” to “RUN” the “check engine” light will come on to inform the driver that the high-voltage system is not energized and the car will not be drivable.

To drive the car the key switch must first be turned from “LOCK” or “OFF” all the way to “START” and then released, from whence the spring load in the key switch will return the key to the “RUN” setting.  Then the warning light will go out, the high-voltage system will be energized, and the car can be driven.

Since the contactors operate from the 12 V system that is energized when the key is at “ON” or “RUN”, this would energize the high voltage system  immediately.  To prevent that we added a relay we call the “feedback relay” in order to restore the starter action of the key switch.  The feedback relay interlocks with the existing starter relay and prevents the “RUN” setting of the key switch from energizing the secondary contactor and the high-voltage system unless the previous setting of the key switch was “START.”

A note on the side
On a gasoline powered car using the “ON” or “RUN” setting of the ignition switch just to listen to the radio wastes battery power since the fuel pump will be running to pressurize the fuel injectors.   The injectors will not open until the crankshaft rotates, so no fuel will flow, but the pump will be at work anyway, enabling you to start the car.  Also the heater or air conditioner blower will probably be on, but no heat or air conditioning is available since the engine is not running.  Other than the waste of electrical power this is not harmful to the car, but it is better to use the “ACC” setting for listening to the radio while the engine is not running.)

5.) Clutch and accelerator interlocks
When the car is started as described above, we do not want the car to lurch forward or backwards in case it was left in gear.  To prevent that there is an interlock switch on the clutch pedal.  The clutch pedal must be fully depressed in order to start the car.  We used the same interlock switch that existed in the starter circuit of the gasoline engine for this.  We also made a connection with the pot-box switch to prevent starting with the accelerator pedal depressed. The clutch pedal must be fully depressed and the accelerator pedal must be fully released to start the car.  (Goosing the electric motor upon starting could damage the bearings.  Since it will have no mechanical load it will very quickly spin up to thousands of RPM’s.  Goosing a jet engine is a bad idea too, for the same reason.)

Back Seat Modification
The biggest issue that has turned up is the weight of the batteries, about 1000 lbs all together.  We took the gasoline engine, fuel tank, exhaust system and so forth out removing about 400 lbs of weight.  But the electric motor, charger, and other new electronics will add back about 150 lbs.  (The charger will be on board so that we can charge at any 120 V outlet.) Thus we are making the car about 750 lbs heavier.  Where we put the batteries will control where the center of gravity is and will affect handling.  If we put most of the batteries in the trunk, behind the rear axle, steering and handling would be compromised.  The weight behind the axle will tend to lift the front of the car off the road on bumps and curves.

Solving this problem has taken more time than any other single issue.  Since the back seat is in front of the axle it seemed a good place for batteries, but the back seat is not high enough above the floor to just put batteries under it.  We decided to cut a hole in the car where the back seat was and build a box for five batteries that extends down into the area where the gas tank formerly was located.  Then we will rebuild the rear seat on top of the battery box.  The photo below shows the hole being cut.  Andrew is leaning in through the rear drivers-side door opening.  (The doors have been temporarily removed to improve working access to the rear-seat area.)  The camera is just outside the passenger side rear door opening.  You can see the spare tire well in the trunk to the left and the rear floor carpeting and front seats all covered in plastic to the right.

Cuting out the back seat

Present Status
As I write, the electric motor and the battery boxes are all in place and the car is ready for the high-voltage wiring.  Just last week the students took the car out for a drive on the parking lot by connecting just one battery to the motor.  We hope to have the high-voltage system and controller functional by Wednesday, May 6 for the senior project presentations.

There will be a public showing of the car during the senior project presentations on Wednesday evening, May 6, 2009 at the Dordt College Science Building. The presentations start at 7:30 PM in room S101.  Other projects that will be presented that same evening are a tensile tester, A base-ball pitching and batting machine, and a shop crane.

EV Project—The Engine is out

human powererd

(Somehow this post was accidentally deleted from the blog. It was originally posted in January.)
I’ve received a number of questions about the electrical vehicle project. Last semester the students did planning and preparation for this project. This semester, starting on Saturday, January 17, the students got started with the dirty part of the project, removing the gasoline engine. The Engine is now out. In a sense that was the easy part of the project because obviously it has to be done. On the other hand, the students learned a lot about front suspensions and other parts of the car from their experience disassembling the car.

The students decided to remove the engine and transmission as a unit since it will then be easier to mate the electric motor to the transmission on a workbench. This required them to disassemble of much of the front suspension (tie rods, control arms, etc.) in order to remove the axles and free the transmission of the wheels. Then they had a choice of lifting the engine/transmission assembly out the top or raising the car and lowering the engine/transmission out the bottom. The engine mounts face downward, making a bottom exit more obvious, but then we would have to arrange for a lift. Instead the students removed two of the engine mounts from both the engine and the body and then used a “cherry picker” (a type of crane) to lift the engine/transmission out the top.

In the photo above you can now see that the car is (temporarily) human powered!
I’ll continue to report on the progress of this project and other matters in future posts.

Some decisions now need to be made such as exactly which brand and type of battery to use. Your comments are welcome.

Senior Projects and More

I have not had time to blog this semester. That’s because I’ve been busy with a lot of good things, including a senior project to convert a 1998 Plymouth Neon to a plug-in electric car powered by batteries. You can read a good update on what is happening on other projects and in the engineering department in general via the ASME newsletter. Here’s a link to that issue of the newsletter. (Also, here is a link to the Dordt College ASME home page.)

Above is a photo of a 1998 Neon, the same color and style as the car we are converting. I’ll post more about that project next semester when the hands-on work gets underway. Right now some simulations are in progress to help us choose the best match of batteries, electric motor, and motor controller.